Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MEHTA v. WIDEN, CV15-01164VAP (DTBx). (2016)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20160906a41 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 01, 2016
Summary: PROPOSED] JUDGMENT VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS , Chief District Judge . The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants City of Upland and Officer Lavell Brown came on regularly for hearing on August 22, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 780 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Honorable Virginia A. Phillips, Judge Presiding. After reviewing the moving and opposing papers, as well as the evidence presented in support of and in opposition to the motio
More

PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants City of Upland and Officer Lavell Brown came on regularly for hearing on August 22, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 780 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Honorable Virginia A. Phillips, Judge Presiding.

After reviewing the moving and opposing papers, as well as the evidence presented in support of and in opposition to the motion, the matter have been duly considered, the issues having been duly heard, and a decision having been duly rendered for Defendants City of Upland and Officer Lavell Brown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants City of Upland and Officer Lavell Brown and against Plaintiffs Harshad Mehta and Kaushika Mehta. Defendants City of Upland and Officer Lavell Brown shall recover their costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer