Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SIEGAL v. GAMBLE, 13 Civ. 3570-RS. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150127a09 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXCEEDING PAGE LIMITATIONS RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and certain Defendants (together, the "Settling Parties") have entered into a Settlement Agreement; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Plaintiffs will, on January 28, 2015, file a Motion For Preliminary Approval of the Settlement; WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement involves multiple parties, and implicates jointly administered proceedings currently in the United Sta
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXCEEDING PAGE LIMITATIONS

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and certain Defendants (together, the "Settling Parties") have entered into a Settlement Agreement;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Plaintiffs will, on January 28, 2015, file a Motion For Preliminary Approval of the Settlement;

WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement involves multiple parties, and implicates jointly administered proceedings currently in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (Case No. 12-12291 (MFW)) (the "Bankruptcy Proceedings");

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have been preparing their Motion and supporting documents in anticipation of the filing on January 28, 2015;

WHEREAS, the Court's Civil Local Rules provide for a 25-page limitation for motions (see Civil L.R. 7-2(b));

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs anticipate that they will require additional pages beyond the 25-page limit, due to the complexities of the case, including large number of parties, the related Bankruptcy Proceedings, and the multiple legal issues implicated in the Motion For Preliminary Approval of the Settlement;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs believe the additional discussion will benefit the parties and the Court in that it will more clearly lay out the factual circumstances, procedural history, and discussion of the legal analysis relevant to the upcoming Motion;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs request an additional 5 pages for their Motion;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between and among all parties, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows (the "Stipulation"):

1. Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to exceed page limitations shall be granted; 2. Plaintiffs' Memorandum In Support of Motion For Preliminary Approval shall be not more than 30 pages.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation and pursuant to Rule 7-11 of the Civil Local Rules, the Court hereby adopts and approves the terms of the parties' stipulation set forth above. Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to exceed page limitations is granted. Plaintiffs' Memorandum In Support Of Motion For Preliminary Approval shall be not more than 30 pages in length.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer