Elawyers Elawyers

RIDGEWAY v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., 3:08-cv-05221-SI. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20151118821 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 17, 2015
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE AMENDED SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . The undersigned counsel, on behalf of Plaintiffs Charles Ridgeway, Jaime Famoso, Joshua Harold, Richard Byers, Dan Thatcher, Nino Pagtama, Willie Franklin, Tim Opitz, Farris Day, Karl Merhoff, and Micheal Krohn ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart," and collectively, with Plaintiffs, the "Parties"), hereby stipulate as follows: RECITALS WHEREAS the
More

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE

AMENDED

The undersigned counsel, on behalf of Plaintiffs Charles Ridgeway, Jaime Famoso, Joshua Harold, Richard Byers, Dan Thatcher, Nino Pagtama, Willie Franklin, Tim Opitz, Farris Day, Karl Merhoff, and Micheal Krohn ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart," and collectively, with Plaintiffs, the "Parties"), hereby stipulate as follows:

RECITALS

WHEREAS the Court has set pre-trial deadlines in its Second Pretrial Preparation Order (Dkt. No. 213) and had previously set deadlines in its Pretrial Preparation Order (Dkt. No. 174);

WHEREAS the parties have worked diligently to resolve discovery and deposition issues in the timing provided by that Order;

WHEREAS Plaintiffs' counsel are currently in the midst of a three month class action trial in another lawsuit that will affect the parties' ability to complete agreed upon discovery and depositions as scheduled, particularly given the time constraints of the coming retail blackout holiday period where many Wal-Mart employees will be unavailable because of business constraints; and

WHEREAS the parties believe they have identified the remaining discovery to be completed and believe the new deadlines will allow an orderly completion of the same.

STIPULATION

Accordingly, the parties now jointly stipulate and respectfully request that this Court order the following changes to the existing schedule:

Event Current Date Proposed New Date Expert Designation October 19, 2015 4/29/16 Expert Rebuttal October 28, 2015 5/20/16 Dispositive Motions January 15, 2016 7/1/16 Oppositions to Dispositive Motions January 29, 2016 7/15/16 Replies In Support of Motions February 5, 2016 7/22/16 Discovery Cutoff (Expert and Non-Expert) December 3, 2015 6/30/16 Pretrial Conference April 12, 2016 9/6/16 Trial April 25, 2016 9/19/16

DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING: 8/5/16 @ 9 A.M.

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a), the declarations of Daniel M. Kopfman and Jesse A. Cripps in support of this stipulation are filed herewith.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the above stipulation, the Stipulation and Order regarding the case management schedule is approved.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer