Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GALEENER v. SOURCE REFRIGERATION & HVAC, INC., 13-cv-04960-VC. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150220a18 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEADLINE TO SUBMIT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND HEARING DATES FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant Source Refrigeration & HVAC, Inc. ("Source") (collectively, the "Parties") jointly submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order requesting that the Court continue the Thursday, February 5, 2015 deadline for the Parties to present the settlement agreement and motion for preliminary approval to today; WHE
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEADLINE TO SUBMIT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND HEARING DATES FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL

VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant Source Refrigeration & HVAC, Inc. ("Source") (collectively, the "Parties") jointly submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order requesting that the Court continue the Thursday, February 5, 2015 deadline for the Parties to present the settlement agreement and motion for preliminary approval to today;

WHEREAS, the Parties also request that the Court set Thursday, February 26, 2015 as the deadline for any opposition to the motion for preliminary approval (which is eight days after filing as opposed to the usual 14), Saturday, February 28, 2015 as the deadline for any reply brief (which is two days later as opposed to the usual seven), and Monday, March 9, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. as the hearing date and time (as currently scheduled) (which is nine days after the reply brief deadline as opposed to the usual 14);

WHEREAS, the Parties believe that this schedule affords time for a ruling on preliminary approval, given that all Parties together jointly support the motion and settlement, and therefore there is no party who will oppose the motion, making a reply unnecessary.

WHEREAS, if any individual or entity (including an absent class member) were to oppose this motion, that individual or entity would have to move to intervene, which would necessitate further briefing and possibly a delay in the hearing;

WHEREAS, if the Court prefers a slower schedule, the Parties jointly propose Thursday, March 12, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. (or any other time the Court wishes);

WHEREAS, the Parties are also available on Thursday, March 19, 2015;

THEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that the Court order that:

1. Today, Wednesday, February 18, 2015, is the deadline for Plaintiff to file the preliminary approval motion, including the settlement agreement; 2. Thursday, February 26, 2015, is the deadline for any opposition to the motion for preliminary approval; 3. Saturday, February 28, 2015, is the deadline for any reply brief; and 4. Monday, March 9, 2015, at 1:00 p.m., as currently scheduled, the Court will hold a hearing on Plaintiff's preliminary approval motion.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that:

1. Today, Wednesday, February 18, 2015, is the deadline for Plaintiff to file the preliminary approval motion, including the settlement agreement; 2. Thursday, February 26, 2015 is the deadline for any opposition to the motion for preliminary approval; 3. Saturday, February 28, 2015 is the deadline for any reply brief; and 4. Monday, March 9, 2015, at 1:00 p.m., as currently scheduled, the Court will hold a hearing on Plaintiff's preliminary approval motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer