GOOD TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION v. MobileIRON, INC., 5:15-cv-01694-PSG. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150609603
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jun. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 08, 2015
Summary: AMENDED CASE SCHEDULING ORDER (Re: Docket No. 61) PAUL S. GREWAL , Magistrate Judge . Based on the parties' joint case management statement and the case management conference last week, 1 IT IS ORDERED that the presumptive limits on discovery set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply to this case with the following exceptions: • Each side may take a total of 100 hours of deposition testimony. • Of the 100 total hours, each side may take up to 35 hours of non-party de
Summary: AMENDED CASE SCHEDULING ORDER (Re: Docket No. 61) PAUL S. GREWAL , Magistrate Judge . Based on the parties' joint case management statement and the case management conference last week, 1 IT IS ORDERED that the presumptive limits on discovery set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply to this case with the following exceptions: • Each side may take a total of 100 hours of deposition testimony. • Of the 100 total hours, each side may take up to 35 hours of non-party dep..
More
AMENDED CASE SCHEDULING ORDER (Re: Docket No. 61)
PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge.
Based on the parties' joint case management statement and the case management conference last week,1
IT IS ORDERED that the presumptive limits on discovery set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply to this case with the following exceptions:
• Each side may take a total of 100 hours of deposition testimony.
• Of the 100 total hours, each side may take up to 35 hours of non-party deposition testimony.
• Each side may take no more than six non-party depositions and eight party depositions.
• Each noticed 30(b)(6) deposition shall count as one party deposition, regardless of how many individuals must be deposed to cover the topics of the particular notice.
• Each side may serve up to 120 requests for production.
• The parties may request relief from these limits for good cause by letter brief.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for joinder of any additional parties, or other amendments to the pleadings, is June 22, 2015.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following schedule and deadlines shall apply to this case:
Initial Disclosure of Asserted Claims/Infringement Contentions
& Accompanying Document Production June 16, 2015
Invalidity Contentions & Accompanying Document Production August 7, 2015
Preliminary Election of Asserted Claims August 14, 2015
Preliminary Election of Asserted Prior Art August 21, 2015
Exchange Proposed Terms for Construction August 28, 2015
Exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence September 25, 2015
Joint Claim Construction & Prehearing Statement October 6, 2015
Claim Construction Discovery Cut-Off November 5, 2015
Opening Claim Construction Brief November 20, 2015
Responsive Claim Construction Brief December 4, 2015
Reply Claim Construction Brief December 11, 2015
Markman Hearing January 6, 2016 at 10:00 AM
Fact Discovery Cut-Off February 26, 2016
Final Election of Asserted Claims March 4, 2016
Final Election of Asserted Prior Art March 11, 2016
Opening Expert Reports March 25, 2016
Rebuttal Expert Reports April 15, 2016
Expert Discovery Cut-Off May 6, 2016
Opening Summary Judgment Briefs May 20, 2016
Responsive Summary Judgment Briefs June 3, 2016
Reply Summary Judgment Briefs June 10, 2016
Summary Judgment Hearing June 21, 2016 at 10:00 AM
Pre-Trial Conference August 16, 2016 at 10:00 AM
Jury Trial August 29, 2016 at 9:30 AM
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. See Docket No. 58.
Source: Leagle
