MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs Langhong Technology USA, Inc. and Hangzhou Langhong Technology Co. Ltd. (collectively, "Langhong"), and Defendant InVue Security Products Inc. ("InVue"), (collectively, Langhong and InVue are hereinafter referred to as "Parties") file this Second Joint Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference ("CMC"), Joint CMC Statement, and Langhong's Answer to Defendant's Counterclaim(s), and state as follows:
WHEREAS, the Parties have reached a settlement in principle that resolves this action, an action pending in the Western District of North Carolina (Charlotte Division), an action pending in the Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth Division), and a proceeding in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, however the parties are continuing to work out specific terms of the agreement,
WHEREAS, on May 12, 2015, the Court granted the Parties' Corrected First Joint Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference and Joint Case Management Statement and ordered that the CMC be held on June 11, 2015 and the Joint CMC Statement be filed by June 4, 2015, (see D.E. 19 at 4)
WHEREAS, in view of their focus on memorializing the settlement reached in principle and in the interest of efficiency, the Parties have agreed that continuing by at least thirty (30) days (a) the CMC and Joint CMC Statement, and (b) Langhong's answer (or other responsive pleading) to InVue's counterclaim(s), would further the resolution of this matter,
The Parties hereby file this Second Joint Stipulation to Continue the CMC, Joint CMC Statement, and Langhong's Answer to Defendant's Counterclaim(s), and respectfully request that the Court continue the CMC to July 13, 2015, and the Joint CMC Statement and Langhong's answer (or other responsive pleading) to InVue's counterclaim(s) to July 6, 2015, or to dates later than the foregoing dates that the Court deems proper. The parties anticipate that prior to these dates, a settlement agreement will be finalized and a dismissal of this action filed.
Having considered that the Parties have reached a settlement in principle,