Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dimdim, Inc. v. Williamson, 3:12-CV-03403-WHO. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150915731 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 14, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING JOINT STATEMENT BE FILED OCTOBER 12, 2015 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . WHEREAS this case has been stayed pending resolution of an appeal to the Federal Circuit from the Richard A. Williamson, et al. v. Citrix Online, LLC, et al. action in the Central District of California, Case No. CV 11-02409-SJO (JEMx) (the "Citrix Action") regarding claim construction of the sole patent-in-suit both in this action and in the Citrix Action; WHEREAS the Federal
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING JOINT STATEMENT BE FILED OCTOBER 12, 2015

WHEREAS this case has been stayed pending resolution of an appeal to the Federal Circuit from the Richard A. Williamson, et al. v. Citrix Online, LLC, et al. action in the Central District of California, Case No. CV 11-02409-SJO (JEMx) (the "Citrix Action") regarding claim construction of the sole patent-in-suit both in this action and in the Citrix Action;

WHEREAS the Federal Circuit issued its decision on June 16, 2015, as described in the parties' Joint Status Report filed concurrently herewith;

WHEREAS the Federal Circuit reversed in part and affirmed in part the district court's claim construction in the Citrix Action and remanded that case for further proceedings in the Central District of California;

WHEREAS the Central District of California has ordered the parties in that case to file a joint position paper by September 14, 2015 regarding the claim terms for which the district court's construction had been reversed and set the matter for a Status Conference on September 28, 2015 as described in the parties' Joint Status Report filed concurrently herewith;

WHEREAS the parties here wish to confer regarding their proposals for the conduct of proceedings in this matter, in view of the Federal Circuit's June 16, 2015 decision and ongoing proceedings in the Central District of California;

THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to file a Joint Statement in this matter in one month, on October 12, 2015, to report their anticipated areas of agreement and their respective positions in the case of disagreement, together constituting the parties' proposals to the Court regarding the status of subsequent proceedings in this matter;

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION PER CIVIL L.R. 5-1(i)

I, Joel C. Boehm, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 5.1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each other signatory.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The parties are hereby ordered to file a Joint Statement in this matter by or before October 12, 2015, to report their anticipated areas of agreement and their respective positions in the case of disagreement, together constituting the parties' proposals to the Court regarding the status of subsequent proceedings in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer