Filed: Jan. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2017
Summary: JUDGMENT OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . On May 4, 2016, Plaintiff Venice Baking Company filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles against Defendant Sophast Sales and Marketing LLC seeking declaratory relief. (Compl. 17-27, ECF No. 1-1.) Defendant removed the case to federal court on August 16, 2016. (ECF No. 1.) On September 19, 2016, the Court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss with prejudice. (ECF No. 11.) It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED
Summary: JUDGMENT OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . On May 4, 2016, Plaintiff Venice Baking Company filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles against Defendant Sophast Sales and Marketing LLC seeking declaratory relief. (Compl. 17-27, ECF No. 1-1.) Defendant removed the case to federal court on August 16, 2016. (ECF No. 1.) On September 19, 2016, the Court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss with prejudice. (ECF No. 11.) It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED ..
More
JUDGMENT
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.
On May 4, 2016, Plaintiff Venice Baking Company filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles against Defendant Sophast Sales and Marketing LLC seeking declaratory relief. (Compl. ¶¶ 17-27, ECF No. 1-1.) Defendant removed the case to federal court on August 16, 2016. (ECF No. 1.) On September 19, 2016, the Court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss with prejudice. (ECF No. 11.)
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:
1. Plaintiff shall recover nothing from Defendant, and its claims against Defendant are dismissed on the merits and with prejudice;
2. Defendant shall recover costs from Plaintiff as evidenced by a bill of costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
