Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SYNOPSYS, INC. v. ATOPTECH, INC., 3:13-cv-02965 MMC (DMR). (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150202623 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2015
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT JOINT FURTHER STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. ("Synopsys") and Defendant ATopTech, Inc. ("ATopTech") hereby make the following stipulated request through their respective counsel of record: WHEREAS, a Further Status Conference is set for February 6, 2015. ECF No. 174. WHEREAS, a Further Status Conference Statement is due January 30, 2015. ECF No. 174. WHEREAS, t
More

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT JOINT FURTHER STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT

MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. ("Synopsys") and Defendant ATopTech, Inc. ("ATopTech") hereby make the following stipulated request through their respective counsel of record:

WHEREAS, a Further Status Conference is set for February 6, 2015. ECF No. 174.

WHEREAS, a Further Status Conference Statement is due January 30, 2015. ECF No. 174.

WHEREAS, the parties are still meeting and conferring on several issues to be addressed in the Further Status Conference Statement.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY REQUESTED AND STIPULATED by the parties that the date for submitting the Further Status Conference Statement be extended to Monday, February 2, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted.

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the above signatory attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer