Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. LINDSEY, 2:11-cr-00217-LDG (CWH). (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20140403b09 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge. The defendant, while represented by counsel, filed pro se motions to inspect grand jury list (#132), to inspect petit jury list (#133), and to compel disclosure of exculpatory evidence (#134). The government has moved to strike the motions (#135) as the defendant is represented by court-appointed counsel, and pursuant to Local Rule IA 10-6(a), a party who is represented by counsel cannot, while so represented, appear or act in the case. The government h
More

ORDER

LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge.

The defendant, while represented by counsel, filed pro se motions to inspect grand jury list (#132), to inspect petit jury list (#133), and to compel disclosure of exculpatory evidence (#134). The government has moved to strike the motions (#135) as the defendant is represented by court-appointed counsel, and pursuant to Local Rule IA 10-6(a), a party who is represented by counsel cannot, while so represented, appear or act in the case. The government has also moved to strike (#113) an earlier notice of appeal that the defendant filed pro se. That motion to strike has been rendered moot.

Therefore, for good cause shown,

THE COURT ORDERS that the United States' Motion to Strike (#113) Defendant's pro se Notice of Appeal is DENIED as moot;

THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that the United States' Motion to Strike (#135) is GRANTED;

THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall STRIKE Documents ## 132, 133, and 134.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer