Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. SANTIAGO, 10-cr-00164-REB-01. (2013)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20130619a45 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2013
Summary: ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge. The matter is before me for preliminary consideration of Defendant Santiago's Motion for Production of Material and Information Concerning DNA Analysis [#587] 1 filed September 24, 2012. In the response of the government [#629], the government identifies the discovery it will produce and disclose to the defense in response to the motion for discovery [#587]. This order is entered to ascertain the status of the disclosure of that discovery. THEREFO
More

ORDER

ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge.

The matter is before me for preliminary consideration of Defendant Santiago's Motion for Production of Material and Information Concerning DNA Analysis [#587]1 filed September 24, 2012. In the response of the government [#629], the government identifies the discovery it will produce and disclose to the defense in response to the motion for discovery [#587]. This order is entered to ascertain the status of the disclosure of that discovery.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that by July 2, 2013, the government SHALL ADVISE the court and the defense of the status of the disclosure and production of the discovery identified by the government in its response [#629].

FootNotes


1. "[#587]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer