Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

O'CONNOR v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 3:13-03826-EMC. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20151117905 Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE RESPONSES ADDRESSING ARGUMENTS RAISED IN SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Douglas O'Connor, Thomas Colopy, Matthew Manahan, and Elie Gurfinkel ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties") stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, on November 13, 2015, the Court
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE RESPONSES ADDRESSING ARGUMENTS RAISED IN SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Douglas O'Connor, Thomas Colopy, Matthew Manahan, and Elie Gurfinkel ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties") stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on November 13, 2015, the Court issued a Supplemental Briefing Order (Dkt. No. 383) stating that by the end of the business day on Monday, November 16, 2015, "[t]he parties may file a response addressing the arguments raised in the supplemental briefs" filed on November 10, 2015 (Dkt. Nos. 380, 381);

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs request an extension of the Court-ordered deadline from the end of the business day on November 16, 2015, to 12:00 p.m. Pacific time on November 18, 2015, because Attorney Adelaide Pagano, who is the primary associate working with Attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan in representing the plaintiffs in this matter, had a death in the family and had to travel to Michigan over the weekend for the funeral, and is expected to return to Boston on the afternoon of November 17, 2015;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs state that Attorney Liss-Riordan is scheduled to participate in a long-scheduled full-day mediation in another matter on November 17, 2015;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs state that this extra time will permit Plaintiffs opportunity to prepare and finalize their reply brief just requested by the Court this past Friday afternoon;

WHEREAS, Defendant is prepared to file its response by the Court-ordered deadline of November 16, 2015, but does not object to Plaintiffs' request for an extension in light of the circumstances;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court's approval, that: The deadline for the parties' responses addressing the arguments raised in the supplemental briefs shall be moved to November 18, 2015, at 12:00 p.m. Pacific time.

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer