ANDERSON v. MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, 13-cv-00885-WYD-MJW. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20130813875
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 12, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2013
Summary: ORDER WILEY Y. DANIEL, Senior District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice [ECF No. 18], filed on August 9, 2013. After carefully reviewing the above-captioned case, I find that the stipulation should be approved and this case should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the FEDERAL RULES of CIVIL PROCEDURE. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the parties' Stipulated Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice [ECF No.
Summary: ORDER WILEY Y. DANIEL, Senior District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice [ECF No. 18], filed on August 9, 2013. After carefully reviewing the above-captioned case, I find that the stipulation should be approved and this case should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the FEDERAL RULES of CIVIL PROCEDURE. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the parties' Stipulated Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice [ECF No. 1..
More
ORDER
WILEY Y. DANIEL, Senior District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice [ECF No. 18], filed on August 9, 2013. After carefully reviewing the above-captioned case, I find that the stipulation should be approved and this case should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the FEDERAL RULES of CIVIL PROCEDURE. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the parties' Stipulated Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice [ECF No. 18] is GRANTED and this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party bears its own attorney fees and costs.
Source: Leagle
