Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Espinoza v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, 5:16-CV-00988-FMO-DFM. (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20190502c29 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2019
Summary: PROPOSED ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1920 DOUGLAS F. McCORMICK , Magistrate Judge . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of SEVEN THOUSAND SEVENTEEN DOLLARS AND TWENTY SIX CENTS ($7,017.26), and costs under 28 U.S.C.
More

PROPOSED ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920

Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of SEVEN THOUSAND SEVENTEEN DOLLARS AND TWENTY SIX CENTS ($7,017.26), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation, to include the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). Any payment shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer