ORDER

Adopting Report & Recommendation:

Affirming Commissioner's Decision; Dismissing the Action With Prejudice;

Directing Entry of Final Terminating the Action (JS-6)

VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, Senior District Judge.

The United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") on October 19, 2019, see CM/ECF Document ("Doc") 20, and the accompanying Notice of Filing R&R (Doc 19) advised the parties that any objections had to be filed no later than November 8, 2018. The parties did not file objections, and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) requires de novo review only of those parts of an R&R to which a party has timely objected. See Khan v. Langford, 2018 WL 1271204, *1 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2018) (citing, inter alia, US v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc)). But the Advisory Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) recommend that when no timely objection is filed, the Court should review the R&R "for clear error on the face of the record." Juarez, 2016 WL 2908238 at *2 (cite omitted); accord Douglass v. USAA, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); Benitez v. Parmer, 654 F. App'x 502, 503 (2d Cir. 2016) (citing, inter alia, Adv. Comm. Notes to 1983 Am. of Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)). On de novo or clear-error review, the Court finds no defect in the R&R. Accordingly, the Court will accept the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions and implement his recommendation.

ORDER

The Report and Recommendation [Doc # 20] is ADOPTED.

The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED.

This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

As required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), judgment will be a separate document.

The case SHALL BE TERMINATED and closed (JS-6).

IT IS SO ORDERED.