Filed: Feb. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS NAMED IN FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. On December 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 16.) The only named Defendants in the First Amended Complaint are J. Beard, S. Pajong, D. Bright, J. Lewis and J. Dunlap. On December 19, 2014, the Court ordered "the Clerk shall issue summons and the Marshal shall serve a copy of the amended complaint, any amendments, attachments, and a copy of this order on each defendan
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS NAMED IN FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. On December 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 16.) The only named Defendants in the First Amended Complaint are J. Beard, S. Pajong, D. Bright, J. Lewis and J. Dunlap. On December 19, 2014, the Court ordered "the Clerk shall issue summons and the Marshal shall serve a copy of the amended complaint, any amendments, attachments, and a copy of this order on each defendant..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS NAMED IN FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
On December 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 16.) The only named Defendants in the First Amended Complaint are J. Beard, S. Pajong, D. Bright, J. Lewis and J. Dunlap.
On December 19, 2014, the Court ordered "the Clerk shall issue summons and the Marshal shall serve a copy of the amended complaint, any amendments, attachments, and a copy of this order on each defendant." (Dkt. No. 17.)
The parties understand that summonses were inadvertently issued and service was inadvertently made on persons and/or entities who are not named Defendants in the First Amended Complaint, specifically, E. Brown, P. Didbal, R. Grounds, J. Walker, and L. Zamora.
The parties stipulate and agree that the First Amended Complaint is the operative complaint in this action and that E. Brown, P. Didbal, R. Grounds, J. Walker, and L. Zamora currently are not Defendants in this action and should not have been served.
It is so stipulated.
Per the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
