Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Truman v. U.S., 2:11-cv-01255-GMN-VCF. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20140509d98 Visitors: 3
Filed: May 09, 2014
Latest Update: May 09, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF CASE DEADLINES (Fifth Request) CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs, Grant Truman and Ingrid Truman, and Defendant, the United States of America, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, hereby request that the Court modify the Scheduling Order in the case, and state as follows in support: The Court issued a Scheduling Order in this case on November 22, 2013. In accordance with the Court's order, the following deadlines are currently in effect: Dispositive Motions
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF CASE DEADLINES (Fifth Request)

CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs, Grant Truman and Ingrid Truman, and Defendant, the United States of America, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, hereby request that the Court modify the Scheduling Order in the case, and state as follows in support:

The Court issued a Scheduling Order in this case on November 22, 2013. In accordance with the Court's order, the following deadlines are currently in effect:

Dispositive Motions March 21, 2014 Pre-trial Order April 21, 2014 In the event dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the proposed joint pre-trial Order shall be suspended until thirty (30) days after decision of the dispositive motion or further Order of the Court.

The parties have recently completed discovery in this matter including the exchange of expert reports and expert depositions. The parties are currently exploring a possible settlement of this matter. Additional time is necessary to allow the parties the opportunity to continue to negotiate a settlement without incurring any additional costs and expenses. Accordingly, the parties hereby request an approximately 60 day extension of the existing deadlines in order to allow the parties to continue to seek a negotiated resolution to this matter.

Specifically, the parties hereby respectfully request that the Court amend the Scheduling Order as follows:

Dispositive Motions May 23, 2014 Pre-trial Order June 23, 2014 In the event dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the proposed joint pre-trial Order shall be suspended until thirty (30) days after decision of the dispositive motion or further Order of the Court.

WHEREFORE, the parties request that the Court modify the Scheduling Order in this case as set forth above.

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING CASE DEADLINES

The Court having read and considered the Stipulation for Extension of Case Deadlines, and for good cause shown, the Motion is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following matters are scheduled and may not be changed without a showing of good cause and Court approval.

Dispositive Motions June 30 May 23, 2014 Pre trial Order July 30 June 23, 2014 In the event dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the proposed joint pre-trial Order shall be suspended until thirty (30) days after decision of the dispositive motion or further Order of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer