Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rosas v. McDonnell, CV 12-00428 DDP (MRWx). (2016)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20160620548 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER GOVERNING THE DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS MICHAEL R. WILNER , Magistrate Judge . Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. With the exception of documents within the attorney-client and attorney-work product privileges—and notwithstanding the confidentiality restrictions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPAA"), the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (Civil Code 56, et seq. ), California Welfa
More

ORDER GOVERNING THE DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. With the exception of documents within the attorney-client and attorney-work product privileges—and notwithstanding the confidentiality restrictions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPAA"), the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (Civil Code §56, et seq.), California Welfare and Institutions Code §5328 (related to confidentiality of mental health records), the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (Government Code §3300, et seq.), Penal Code §832.7, and Evidence Code §§ 1043 and 1045—the Monitors and their staff will have full and complete access to prisoner medical and mental health records, personnel records, and all other documents and data related to the provisions of the Agreement and necessary to assess Defendants' compliance with the Agreement. Nothing in this paragraph waives any argument or claim by Plaintiff that the state law provisions cite above, or any other state or federal common law, statute or regulation creates a valid privilege or right to withhold documents from Plaintiffs in this federal court litigation which addresses Plaintiffs' claims that their federal constitutional rights are being violated.

2. The Monitors will safeguard and maintain the confidentiality of the Defendant's documents, statements or information, including but not limited to those items identified in paragraph 1 above, and shall not disclose those documents, statements or information. Nothing in this paragraph shall be interpreted to mean that the Monitors may not otherwise rely on Defendants' documents, statements or information in forming their conclusions or opinions about Defendants' compliance with the Agreement or the Plan. Nothing in this paragraph waives any right of Plaintiffs to obtain documents, as otherwise permitted by the Agreement or law, that Defendant provides to the Monitors, or waives any argument by Plaintiffs that any document or portion thereof that Defendant provides to the Monitors is not privileged or confidential and may not be withheld from Plaintiffs.

3. This stipulation will not be deemed a waiver of any privilege or right Defendants may assert, including those recognized at common law or created by statute, rule, or regulation, against any other person or entity with respect to the disclosure of any document, statement or information.

4. This Order and the obligations of this stipulation shall survive the final termination of this case or withdrawal or removal of the monitor or staff member.

5. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve any dispute concerning the use or disclosure of any documents, statements or information addressed by this stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer