STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS FOR MOTIONS REGARDING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

Plaintiff and Defendants (collectively, "Parties") in the above-captioned case hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on November 11, 2014, the Court issued a stipulated Scheduling Order Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction setting January 29, 2015 as the deadline for Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 33);

WHEREAS, the Court subsequently revised the briefing schedule upon stipulation of the Parties, setting February 26, 2015 as the deadline for Plaintiff to file her Motion for Preliminary Injunction and March 12, 2015 as the deadline for Defendants to file their opposition (Dkt. No. 48);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff believes — and Defendants do not oppose — that good cause exists to extend the page limitations provided in the Local Rules for the briefing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction;

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all parties to this action, through their undersigned counsel of record, as follows:

1. Plaintiff's memorandum of points and authorities in support of her Motion for Preliminary Injunction may be up to 30 pages in length.

2. Defendants' memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction may be up to 30 pages in length.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.