Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

STANLEY v. GREAT GLAM, INC., 161 So.3d 457 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals of Florida Number: inflco20140611136 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2014
Summary: PER CURIAM . Brittanie Stanley appeals a final judgment that was entered based on the trial court's earlier decision to dismiss a claim of pregnancy discrimination under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, which is codified at sections 760.01 through 760.11 and section 509.092 of the Florida Statutes. The limited issue of law in this case turns on whether section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2012), prohibits discrimination on the basis of pregnancy by an employer in Florida. In a recent
More

Brittanie Stanley appeals a final judgment that was entered based on the trial court's earlier decision to dismiss a claim of pregnancy discrimination under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, which is codified at sections 760.01 through 760.11 and section 509.092 of the Florida Statutes. The limited issue of law in this case turns on whether section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2012), prohibits discrimination on the basis of pregnancy by an employer in Florida. In a recent decision, the Florida Supreme Court interpreted section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), as prohibiting discrimination by an employer on the basis of pregnancy. See Delva v. Cont'l Grp., Inc., 137 So.3d 371 (Fla.2014). Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

ALTENBERND, SILBERMAN, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer