Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Harris v. Best Buy Stores, L.P., 3:15-CV-00657 HSG. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150901772 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING AND RESPONDING TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER THEREON HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . WHEREAS, at the May 19, 2015 Case Management Conference ("CMC"), the parties informed the Court that: (a) they had not yet started discovery because the Rule 26 conference was held a short time earlier; and (b) if there were no discovery disputes and the parties were able to receive all necessary discovery, they would be in a position to file or d
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING AND RESPONDING TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER THEREON

WHEREAS, at the May 19, 2015 Case Management Conference ("CMC"), the parties informed the Court that: (a) they had not yet started discovery because the Rule 26 conference was held a short time earlier; and (b) if there were no discovery disputes and the parties were able to receive all necessary discovery, they would be in a position to file or defend against a motion for summary judgment related to Plaintiff's individual claims within in a few months of the CMC;

WHEREAS, based upon the foregoing, the Court set an August 19, 2015 deadline for the parties to bring a summary judgment motion relating to Plaintiff's individual claims;

WHEREAS, the parties have propounded and engaged in discovery directly after the CMC;

WHEREAS, counsel for both parties were traveling and unavailable at different times during July, 2015, which made it impossible to conduct depositions that month;

WHEREAS, the parties have had discovery disputes relating to written discovery and depositions since the CMC. The parties are continuing to engage in meet and confer discussions relating to Rule 30(b)(6) deposition topics and written discovery. The parties may need to file a joint discovery brief with the Court to address certain issues. After the issues are resolved, Plaintiff will need to take the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition; and

WHEREAS, the Parties need additional time to obtain the necessary discovery to bring or defend against a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 56(d).

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED as follows:

(1) The deadline for both parties to file a motion for summary judgment is extended from August 19, 2015 until October 19, 2015; and (2) If a party files a motion for summary judgment prior to October 19, 2015, the other party will have until November 2, 2015 to file opposition papers.

ORDER

For good cause shown, the Court hereby orders that the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 22) is November 2, 2015.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer