MARTENEY v. EASTMAN OUTDOORS, INC., 2:14-CV-351 JCM (PAL). (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140318b96
Visitors: 24
Filed: Mar. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. Presently before the court is plaintiff Rebecca Marteney's ex parte motion for an extension of time. (Doc. # 7). Plaintiff requests an extension to September 12, 2014, in which to serve defendant "Kyle." The local rules require that "[a]ll ex parte motions, applications, or requests shall contain a statement showing good cause why the matter was submitted to the Court without notice to all parties." LR 7-5(b). "Motions, applications, or requests may b
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. Presently before the court is plaintiff Rebecca Marteney's ex parte motion for an extension of time. (Doc. # 7). Plaintiff requests an extension to September 12, 2014, in which to serve defendant "Kyle." The local rules require that "[a]ll ex parte motions, applications, or requests shall contain a statement showing good cause why the matter was submitted to the Court without notice to all parties." LR 7-5(b). "Motions, applications, or requests may be..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is plaintiff Rebecca Marteney's ex parte motion for an extension of time. (Doc. # 7). Plaintiff requests an extension to September 12, 2014, in which to serve defendant "Kyle."
The local rules require that "[a]ll ex parte motions, applications, or requests shall contain a statement showing good cause why the matter was submitted to the Court without notice to all parties." LR 7-5(b). "Motions, applications, or requests may be submitted ex parte only for compelling reasons, and not for unopposed or emergency motions." LR 7-5(c).
Plaintiff has submitted the instant motion ex parte and has failed to include a statement showing good cause why the motion was submitted without notice to all defendants, in violation of the local rules.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff's motion to extend time (doc. # 7) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
