U.S. v. PARKER, 2:10-cr-547-RLH-PAL. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140917e46
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER (Motion for Reduction—#879) ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Ki Yong Parker's Motion for Reduction of Sentence Pursuant to 18 USC 3592 (c)(2) Based on a Retroactive Amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines (#879, filed August 28, 2014). The Government filed its Opposition (#880) on September 4, 2014. Because the Defendant's Motion is based upon a "proposed" amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which have yet to be adopted, the
Summary: ORDER (Motion for Reduction—#879) ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Ki Yong Parker's Motion for Reduction of Sentence Pursuant to 18 USC 3592 (c)(2) Based on a Retroactive Amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines (#879, filed August 28, 2014). The Government filed its Opposition (#880) on September 4, 2014. Because the Defendant's Motion is based upon a "proposed" amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which have yet to be adopted, the ..
More
ORDER (Motion for Reduction—#879)
ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Ki Yong Parker's Motion for Reduction of Sentence Pursuant to 18 USC § 3592 (c)(2) Based on a Retroactive Amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines (#879, filed August 28, 2014). The Government filed its Opposition (#880) on September 4, 2014.
Because the Defendant's Motion is based upon a "proposed" amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which have yet to be adopted, the Motion is premature.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Parker's Motion for Reduction of Sentence Pursuant to 18 USC § 3592 (c)(2) Based on a Retroactive Amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines (#879, filed August 28, 2014) is DENIED as premature, without prejudice to refile the Motion when and if the proposed amendment is adopted.
Source: Leagle
