Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. LOPER, 2:14-cr-00321-KJD-NJK. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20141119e86
Filed: Nov. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER (Mot Reopen Det—Dkt. #49) (Mot Seal—Dkt. #52) PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge. Before the court is Defendant Justin Loper's ("Loper") Motion to Reopen Detention Hearing (Dkt. #49) and the Motion to Seal Reply (Dkt. #52). The court has considered the Motion, the government's Response (Dkt. #50), and Loper's Sealed Reply (Dkt. #52). Loper made an initial appearance on July 31, 2014, on a Complaint (Dkt. #1), and was subsequently Indicted (Dkt. #27) and charged with one count of conspiracy
More

ORDER (Mot Reopen Det—Dkt. #49) (Mot Seal—Dkt. #52)

PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.

Before the court is Defendant Justin Loper's ("Loper") Motion to Reopen Detention Hearing (Dkt. #49) and the Motion to Seal Reply (Dkt. #52). The court has considered the Motion, the government's Response (Dkt. #50), and Loper's Sealed Reply (Dkt. #52).

Loper made an initial appearance on July 31, 2014, on a Complaint (Dkt. #1), and was subsequently Indicted (Dkt. #27) and charged with one count of conspiracy to interfere with commerce by robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951, two counts of interference with commerce by robbery, and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951 and 18 U.S.C. § 2, and two counts of brandishing a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence, and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii) and (iii), and 18 U.S.C. § 2. He was detained following a detention hearing. Loper subsequently moved to dismiss his courtappointed counsel. See Motion (Dkt. #22). In a hearing conducted October 7, 2014, Judge Koppe granted counsel's Motion to Withdraw (Dkt. #18) and Loper's Motion to Dismiss Counsel (Dkt. #22) and appointed current counsel Maysoun Fletcher. See Minutes of Proceedings (Dkt. #35).

Newly appointed counsel for Loper seeks to reopen the detention hearing arguing that prior appointed counsel only met with him briefly before his initial appearance and detention hearing, did not contest detention, and advised Loper not to be interviewed by Pretrial Services. Counsel for Loper requests that he be interviewed by Pretrial Services and considered for release. The government opposes Loper's release, but does not oppose his request to be interviewed by Pretrial Services.

The Motion to Seal the Reply (Dkt. #32) requests that the Reply (Dkt. #51) be sealed as it inadvertently contained a social security number.

Having reviewed and considered the matter,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Loper's request to be interviewed by Pretrial Services is GRANTED. 2. A hearing on his Motion to Reopen Detention Hearing (Dkt. #49) is set for Wednesday, November 19, 2014, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 3B. 3. The Motion to Seal (Dkt. #52) Loper's Reply (Dkt. #51) is GRANTED to the limited extent that counsel shall refile the reply redacted of the social security number, and the original Reply (Dkt. #51) may remain under seal, but the reply redacted of the social security number shall be part of the public record.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer