WARREN v. MASTO, 3:14-cv-00479-RCJ-VPC. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150106c98
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. Petitioner has submitted a request for clarification and extension of time (#9). Petitioner expresses confusion with naming the warden of the prison as a respondent, because the sentence he is challenging has expired. Regardless of the status of that sentence, petitioner is in prison, and the correct respondent is the warden of that prison. The court will give petitioner additional time to submit an amended petition that corrects the defect. IT IS THERE
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. Petitioner has submitted a request for clarification and extension of time (#9). Petitioner expresses confusion with naming the warden of the prison as a respondent, because the sentence he is challenging has expired. Regardless of the status of that sentence, petitioner is in prison, and the correct respondent is the warden of that prison. The court will give petitioner additional time to submit an amended petition that corrects the defect. IT IS THEREF..
More
ORDER
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
Petitioner has submitted a request for clarification and extension of time (#9). Petitioner expresses confusion with naming the warden of the prison as a respondent, because the sentence he is challenging has expired. Regardless of the status of that sentence, petitioner is in prison, and the correct respondent is the warden of that prison. The court will give petitioner additional time to submit an amended petition that corrects the defect.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the request for clarification and extension of time (#9) is GRANTED in part. Petitioner shall have through January 16, 2014, to file an amended petition in accordance with the court's earlier order (#5).
Source: Leagle
