PRATT v. COX, 3:11-CV-00604-RCJ-WGC. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140321c92
Visitors: 22
Filed: Mar. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate (ECF #39) entered on February 6, 2014, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment (#35). The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 636 and applicable case
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate (ECF #39) entered on February 6, 2014, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment (#35). The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 636 and applicable case ..
More
ORDER
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate (ECF #39) entered on February 6, 2014, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment (#35). The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby
ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF #39).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment (#35) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Source: Leagle
