WHYTE v. BARCLAYS BANK PLC, 13-2653-cv. (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Number: infco20160325148
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2016
Summary: SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this court's Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an electronic database (with the notation "summary order"). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it on any party not represent
Summary: SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this court's Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an electronic database (with the notation "summary order"). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it on any party not represente..
More
SUMMARY ORDER
Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this court's Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an electronic database (with the notation "summary order"). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it on any party not represented by counsel.
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff Bettina M. Whyte, as Trustee of the SemGroup Litigation Trust, appeals from the district court's June 12, 2013, judgment granting defendants' motions to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The district court held that "the [Bankruptcy Code's] section 546(g) `safe harbor' impliedly preempts state-law fraudulent conveyance actions seeking to avoid `swap transactions' as defined by the Code." Whyte v. Barclays Bank PLC, 494 B.R. 196, 201 (S.D.N.Y. 2013). We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in In re: Tribune Company Fraudulent Conveyance Litigation, 13-3992-cv; 13-3875-cv; 13-4178-cv; 13-4196-cv, which was heard in tandem with the present matter.
FootNotes
** We direct the Clerk of Court to amend the caption as noted.
* The Honorable Alvin K. Hellerstein, of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.
Source: Leagle
