Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

AGUIRRE v. SOUTHERN NEVADA HEALTH DISTRICT, INC., 2:13-cv-01409-LDG-CWH. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20140514d84 Visitors: 16
Filed: May 13, 2014
Latest Update: May 13, 2014
Summary: ORDER LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge. The plaintiff, Ruben Aguirre, through his attorney, M. Lani Esteban-Trinidad, moves to amend his complaint. None of the defendants has opposed the motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), the failure to file points and authorities in opposition constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion. Therefore, THE COURT ORDERS that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (#26) is GRANTED; The Clerk of the Court shall file the proposed Amended Complaint, atta
More

ORDER

LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Ruben Aguirre, through his attorney, M. Lani Esteban-Trinidad, moves to amend his complaint. None of the defendants has opposed the motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), the failure to file points and authorities in opposition constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion. Therefore,

THE COURT ORDERS that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (#26) is GRANTED; The Clerk of the Court shall file the proposed Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit 1 to Plaintiff's Motion.

THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#5) is DENIED without prejudice as moot.

THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgement (#8) and his Motion for Default Judgement (#12) are DENIED without prejudice as moot.

THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Reply (#15) and Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Reply (#16) are DENIED without prejudice as moot.

THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that Defendants' Counter-Motion to Dismiss (#18) is DENIED without prejudice as moot.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer