Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gay v. CreditInform, 06-4036 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 06-4036 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 08, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-8-2008 Gay v. CreditInform Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 06-4036 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008 Recommended Citation "Gay v. CreditInform" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 1655. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/1655 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the Unit
More
Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-8-2008 Gay v. CreditInform Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 06-4036 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008 Recommended Citation "Gay v. CreditInform" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 1655. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/1655 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT December 21, 2007 Docket No. 06-4036 MARY GAY, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Appellant v. CREDITINFORM; INTERSECTIONS, INC. Present: FISHER, ALDISERT AND GREENBERG, Circuit Judges 1. Appellee’s Motion for Amendment of the Opinion dated December 19, 2007 /s/ Dana Moore Dana Moore, Case Manager Response Due 1/708 (267) 299-4927 ORDER The foregoing motion is granted to the end that the last sentence in footnote 2 on page 3 of the slip opinion will read as follows: Inasmuch as Intersections, notwithstanding its claim that the CROA does not apply to it, treats the CROA as applicable in this case, we will do the same but do so without resolving the dispute between the parties as to whether services Intersections supplied Gay are credit repair products. By the Court, /s/ Morton I. Greenberg Circuit Judge Dated: January 8, 2008 DMM/cc: James A. Francis, Esq. David A. Searles, Esq. Christopher D. Thomas, Esq. David R. Fine, Esq. Carleton O. Strouss, Esq.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer