Filed: Jun. 18, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1272 BONNIE RIFFLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE BRADSHAW, Sergeant; LARRY BRADLEY, Captain; CHARLES PLATT, Trooper; J.C. SPRIGGS, Sergeant; GARY EDGELL, Colonel, West Virginia State Police; WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CA-01-62-3) Submitted: June 13, 2
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1272 BONNIE RIFFLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE BRADSHAW, Sergeant; LARRY BRADLEY, Captain; CHARLES PLATT, Trooper; J.C. SPRIGGS, Sergeant; GARY EDGELL, Colonel, West Virginia State Police; WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CA-01-62-3) Submitted: June 13, 20..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1272
BONNIE RIFFLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEORGE BRADSHAW, Sergeant; LARRY BRADLEY,
Captain; CHARLES PLATT, Trooper; J.C. SPRIGGS,
Sergeant; GARY EDGELL, Colonel, West Virginia
State Police; WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,
District Judge. (CA-01-62-3)
Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bonnie Riffle, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Kent Phillips, STEPTOE &
JOHNSON, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Bonnie Riffle appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Riffle v. Bradshaw, No. CA-01-62-3 (N.D.W.
Va. Jan. 28, 2002); see also Heck v. Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477, 486-87
(1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2