Filed: May 24, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1018 VASU D. ARORA, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SAHAI INDERNEEL; BUCHANAN GENERAL HOSPITAL; DOES 1 THROUGH 25, Defendants - Appellees, and H. A. STREET, Party in Interest. No. 05-1019 VASU D. ARORA, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MANSOOR HYDER; APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL; DOES 1 THROUGH 25, Defendants - Appellees, and H. A. STREET, Party in Interest. No. 05-1020 VASU D. ARORA, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, v
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1018 VASU D. ARORA, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SAHAI INDERNEEL; BUCHANAN GENERAL HOSPITAL; DOES 1 THROUGH 25, Defendants - Appellees, and H. A. STREET, Party in Interest. No. 05-1019 VASU D. ARORA, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MANSOOR HYDER; APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL; DOES 1 THROUGH 25, Defendants - Appellees, and H. A. STREET, Party in Interest. No. 05-1020 VASU D. ARORA, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, ve..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1018
VASU D. ARORA, M.D.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SAHAI INDERNEEL; BUCHANAN GENERAL HOSPITAL;
DOES 1 THROUGH 25,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
H. A. STREET,
Party in Interest.
No. 05-1019
VASU D. ARORA, M.D.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MANSOOR HYDER; APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL;
DOES 1 THROUGH 25,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
H. A. STREET,
Party in Interest.
No. 05-1020
VASU D. ARORA, M.D.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ABU S. MATIN, M.D.; DOES 1 THROUGH 25; JOHN
DOE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
H. A. STREET,
Party in Interest.
05-1021
VASU D. ARORA, M.D.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KAMRAN FASIH, M.D.; APPALACHIAN REGIONAL
HOSPITAL; DOES 1 THROUGH 25,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
- 2 -
H. A. STREET,
Party in Interest.
No. 05-1022
VASU D. ARORA, M.D.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
AMJAD HUSAIN, M.D.; BUCHANAN GENERAL HOSPITAL;
DOES 1 THROUGH 25,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
H. A. STREET,
Party in Interest.
No. 05-1023
VASU D. ARORA, M.D.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOSE A. ALEMPARTE, M.D.; BUCHANAN GENERAL
HOSPITAL; M. J. THAKKER; TRI STATE CLINIC;
SPARKS MEDICAL CENTER; DOES 1 THROUGH 25,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
- 3 -
H. A. STREET,
Party in Interest.
No. 05-1024
VASU D. ARORA, M.D.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RANA TABASSUM, M.D.; APPALACHIAN REGIONAL
HOSPITAL; DOES 1 THROUGH 25,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
H. A. STREET,
Party in Interest.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District
Judge. (CA-04-30-1; CA-04-31-1; CA-04-32-1; CA-04-33-1; CA-04-34-
1; CA-04-35-1; CA-04-36-1)
Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 24, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vasu D. Arora, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Ralph Scott, Jr., STREET,
STREET, STREET, SCOTT & BOWMAN, Grundy, Virginia; William Morris
Moffett, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abington, Virginia; Kimberly W.
- 4 -
Daniel, HANCOCK, DANIEL, JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Glen Allen, Virginia;
Robert Brooks Altizer, GILLESPIE, HART, ALTIZER & WHITESELL,
Tazewell, Virginia; Bryan Grimes Williams Creasy, JOHNSON, AYERS &
MATTHEWS, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 5 -
PER CURIAM:
In these seven appeals, Vasu D. Arora appeals from the
district court's orders dismissing his actions in which he asserted
claims for breach of contract and tortious interference with a
contract and enjoining him from filing further actions in the
district court pro se without prior permission from the court. We
have reviewed the records and find no reversible error and no abuse
of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Arora v. Inderneel, No. CA-04-30-1 (W.D. Va.
Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v. Hyder, No. CA-04-31-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 24,
2004); Arora v. Matin, No. CA-04-32-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2004);
Arora v. Fasih, No. CA-04-33-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v.
Husain, No. CA-04-34-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v.
Alemparte, No. CA-04-35-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v.
Tabassum, No. CA-04-36-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2004); see In re March,
988 F.2d 498, 500 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 6 -