Filed: Mar. 26, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-6819 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EARL TYRONE WILLIAMS, a/k/a Bucky Williams, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-103-HAR, CA-94-1774-HAR) Submitted: March 5, 1996 Decided: March 26, 1996 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-6819 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EARL TYRONE WILLIAMS, a/k/a Bucky Williams, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-103-HAR, CA-94-1774-HAR) Submitted: March 5, 1996 Decided: March 26, 1996 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6819
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EARL TYRONE WILLIAMS, a/k/a Bucky Williams,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge.
(CR-88-103-HAR, CA-94-1774-HAR)
Submitted: March 5, 1996 Decided: March 26, 1996
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl Tryone Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Welsh, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (1988) motion. Although he raises several ineffec-
tive assistance of counsel claims, he fails to establish prejudice.
Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). Furthermore,
Appellant's sentence of supervised release for a crime committed on
July 1, 1987, does not violate the Ex Post Facto clause. Gozlon-
Peretz v. United States,
498 U.S. 395, 409-10 (1991). Accordingly,
we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2