Filed: Dec. 16, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-20174 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ULYSSES LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-95-149-1 - - - - - - - - - - December 10, 1996 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ulysses Lopez appeals his sentence following his conviction for conspiracy to commit wi
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-20174 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ULYSSES LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-95-149-1 - - - - - - - - - - December 10, 1996 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ulysses Lopez appeals his sentence following his conviction for conspiracy to commit wir..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-20174
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ULYSSES LOPEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. CR-H-95-149-1
- - - - - - - - - -
December 10, 1996
Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ulysses Lopez appeals his sentence following his conviction
for conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud, in violation of 18
U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1341. Lopez asserts that the district court
erred by failing to reduce his offense level based on his
acceptance of responsibility. We have reviewed the record and
the briefs of the parties and hold that the district court’s
finding was not clearly erroneous that the reduction was
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-20174
- 2 -
unwarranted. See United States v. Watson,
988 F.2d 544, 551 (5th
Cir. 1993), cert. denied,
510 U.S. 1048 (1994).
AFFIRMED.