IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 96-20931
                         USDC No. H-95-CV-819



CALVIN BURNETT COLEMAN,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

M. BLACKBURN,

                                           Defendant-Appellee,


                        - - - - - - - - - -
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                        - - - - - - - - - -
                           April 11, 1997
Before KING, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Calvin Burnett Coleman, a Texas inmate (# 614644), appeals

from the district court judgment granting defendant Blackburn’s

motion for summary judgment in his civil rights action alleging

interference with his mail privileges and retaliation.     Coleman

has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”)

on appeal.     The motion for leave to appeal IFP is GRANTED.

     Coleman must pay an initial partial filing fee of $3.55,

based on average monthly deposits of $17.76 in his inmate trust

     *
        Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
                            No. 96-20931
                                - 2 -

fund account.    See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).     After Coleman pays

the initial fee, he shall make monthly payments of twenty percent

of the preceding month’s income credited to his prison trust fund

account.    See § 1915(b)(2).   The agency having custody of Coleman

shall forward payments from his account to the clerk of the

district court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10

until the filing fee of $105 is paid.      

a de novo review and applying the same

standard as a district court, Brewer v. Wilkinson, 

,

819-20 (5th Cir. 1993), we AFFIRM the judgment of the district

court.    Coleman failed to establish that a genuine issue of

material fact existed as to his allegations that Blackburn

destroyed or withheld his outgoing or incoming legal mail, or

acted with retaliatory motive.     See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 

, 322 (1986); Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c), (e).      Coleman had no

right to have legal mail opened in his presence.       

.

     Coleman does not present a nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

See Howard v. King, 

, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).

Accordingly, his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous.       See 5th Cir.

R. 42.2.

     IFP GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.