Filed: Apr. 24, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-40498 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ISAUL SALINAS, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-95-CR-163-02 _ April 11, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Isaul Salinas Jr., appeals his convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute approximately seven kilograms of coca
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-40498 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ISAUL SALINAS, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-95-CR-163-02 _ April 11, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Isaul Salinas Jr., appeals his convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute approximately seven kilograms of cocai..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 96-40498
Summary Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ISAUL SALINAS, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. M-95-CR-163-02
_________________________________________________________________
April 11, 1997
Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Isaul Salinas Jr., appeals his convictions for conspiracy to
possess with intent to distribute approximately seven kilograms
of cocaine and attempted possession with intent to distribute
approximately seven kilograms of cocaine. Salinas argues that
the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. He
also contends, for the first time on appeal, that the district
judge’s questioning of him deprived him of a fair trial. Our
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
review of the record and the arguments and authorities convinces
us that no reversible error was committed. The evidence was
sufficient for a reasonable jury to find Salinas guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt. See United States v. Alix,
86 F.3d 429, 435-36
(5th Cir. 1996). Nor did the district judge plainly err by
questioning Salinas during trial. See United States v. Mizell,
88 F.3d 288, 296-97 (5th Cir. 1996).
AFFIRMED.
2