Filed: Mar. 12, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-50915 USDC No. EP-97-CV-200-F SANTIAGO DELGADO MEDRANO, Petitioner-Appellant, versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas - March 2, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: Santiago Delgado Medrano seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) from t
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-50915 USDC No. EP-97-CV-200-F SANTIAGO DELGADO MEDRANO, Petitioner-Appellant, versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas - March 2, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: Santiago Delgado Medrano seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) from th..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-50915
USDC No. EP-97-CV-200-F
SANTIAGO DELGADO MEDRANO,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,
INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,
Respondent-Appellee.
---------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
---------------------
March 2, 1998
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
Santiago Delgado Medrano seeks a certificate of
appealability (COA) from the denial of his petition filed
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. COA is GRANTED and the case is
VACATED AND REMANDED for further proceedings. Clark v. Williams,
693 F.2d 381, 382 (5th Cir. 1982).
The district court erred in determining that Medrano had
failed to exhaust his state remedies on his claims that he was
denied a speedy trial and the right to be present at a critical
stage of trial given that he presented them on direct review to
O R D E R
No. 97-50915
-2-
the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Richardson v.
Procunier,
762 F.2d 427, 429, 431-32 (5th Cir. 1982). On remand,
the district court should afford Medrano the opportunity to file
an amended petition deleting his remaining two unexhausted
claims. See Rose v. Lundy,
455 U.S. 509, 520 (1982); McGruder v.
Phelps,
608 F.2d 1023, 1025 (5th Cir. 1979).
COA GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.