Filed: May 18, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-10282 Document: 00511114301 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/18/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 18, 2010 No. 10-10282 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk TERRY JAMES, Plaintiff - Appellant v. RICHARD LEMAY; WANDA PARISH; THERESA TRISTEIN, Defendants - Appellants Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CV-76 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges
Summary: Case: 10-10282 Document: 00511114301 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/18/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 18, 2010 No. 10-10282 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk TERRY JAMES, Plaintiff - Appellant v. RICHARD LEMAY; WANDA PARISH; THERESA TRISTEIN, Defendants - Appellants Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CV-76 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges...
More
Case: 10-10282 Document: 00511114301 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/18/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
May 18, 2010
No. 10-10282
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
TERRY JAMES,
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
RICHARD LEMAY; WANDA PARISH; THERESA TRISTEIN,
Defendants - Appellants
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:10-CV-76
Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by the
magistrate judge and district judge.
Federal courts are limited in their jurisdiction. Defamation or injury to
reputation is not a protected liberty interest to justify federal jurisdiction. Paul
v. Davis,
96 S. Ct. 1155 (1976). And Mr. James has not complained of a
conspiracy to harm him because of his race.
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.