Filed: Aug. 30, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-50215 Conference Calendar ALTON JEROME MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-99-CV-13 - August 27, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Federal prisoner Alton Jerome Moore challenges the district court’s dismissal of his lawsuit seeking damages from the
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-50215 Conference Calendar ALTON JEROME MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-99-CV-13 - August 27, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Federal prisoner Alton Jerome Moore challenges the district court’s dismissal of his lawsuit seeking damages from the U..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-50215
Conference Calendar
ALTON JEROME MOORE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. W-99-CV-13
--------------------
August 27, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Federal prisoner Alton Jerome Moore challenges the district
court’s dismissal of his lawsuit seeking damages from the U.S.
for alleged wrongs and omissions surrounding his arrest for
possession of crack cocaine with the intent to distribute. The
district court erred in construing the complaint as a Bivens**
action since the suit was brought against only the United States
for its wrongful acts and omissions, not against any named
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
**
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents,
403 U.S. 388 (1971).
No. 99-50215
-2-
individual federal agents. See Enplanar, Inc. v. Marsh,
11 F.3d
1284, 1295 (5th Cir. 1994) (Bivens is the vehicle by which the
victim of a constitutional violation by a federal agent may
recover damages against the federal agent in federal court).
Nevertheless, dismissal of the complaint was appropriate.
As the district court determined, because resolution of this
action would necessarily impact the validity of Moore's
conviction and sentence, Heck v. Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477 (1994),
mandates dismissal since no cause of action accrues unless and
until Moore can show that he has obtained some measure of success
through postconviction proceedings.
AFFIRMED.