Filed: Apr. 14, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: No. 99-60713 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-60713 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICHARD KUEBLER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:98-CR-132-B - April 13, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Richard Kuebler seeks to appeal his conviction resulting from being ticketed by a United States Park Servic
Summary: No. 99-60713 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-60713 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICHARD KUEBLER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:98-CR-132-B - April 13, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Richard Kuebler seeks to appeal his conviction resulting from being ticketed by a United States Park Service..
More
No. 99-60713
-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-60713
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RICHARD KUEBLER,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 1:98-CR-132-B
--------------------
April 13, 2000
Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Richard Kuebler seeks to appeal his conviction resulting
from being ticketed by a United States Park Service ranger for
going 63 miles per hour in a 50 miles per hour zone of the
Natchez Trace Parkway. This court must examine the basis of its
jurisdiction. Mosley v. Cozby,
813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.
1987). A timely notice of appeal is necessary to the exercise of
appellate jurisdiction. United States v. Cooper,
135 F.3d 960,
961 (5th Cir. 1998).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-60713
-2-
The district court entered judgment on September 9, 1999,
and Kuebler’s notice of appeal was not filed until September 27,
1999, more than 10 days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R.
App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i) and 26(a). Kuebler asserts that he
perfected his appeal on September 22, 1999, the date on which the
notice of appeal was mailed. Because Kuebler was not
incarcerated, the “mailbox rule” does not apply and his notice of
appeal was not timely because it was not received by the Clerk
within ten days of entry of judgment. See United States v.
Clark,
193 F.3d 845, 846 n.3 (5th Cir. 1999). Kuebler’s appeal
is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.