Berg v. State of RI, 94-1984 (1995)
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Number: 94-1984
Visitors: 23
Filed: Feb. 08, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: February 8, 1995 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 94-1984 JANICE M. BERG, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees.Per Curiam. Lancellotti v. Fay, 909 F.2d 15, 17 (1st, __________________ Cir.
USCA1 Opinion
February 8, 1995
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 94-1984
JANICE M. BERG,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
[Hon. Ronald R. Lagueux, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
___________
Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
Janice M. Berg on brief pro se.
______________
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. Plaintiff's action essentially sought
__________
federal court review of state family court proceedings.
Because lower federal courts do not have the authority to
review such proceedings, we affirm the dismissal of
plaintiff's action. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S.
_____________________________
413, 415-16 (1923); Lancellotti v. Fay, 909 F.2d 15, 17 (1st
__________________
Cir. 1990).
Affirmed.
________
Source: CourtListener
