Filed: Dec. 11, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50406 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PEDRO NARANJO-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-1551-ALL-H - December 11, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Following a bench trial, Pedro Naranjo-Hernandez, who was previously convicted of an aggravated felony,
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50406 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PEDRO NARANJO-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-1551-ALL-H - December 11, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Following a bench trial, Pedro Naranjo-Hernandez, who was previously convicted of an aggravated felony, w..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-50406
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PEDRO NARANJO-HERNANDEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. EP-00-CR-1551-ALL-H
--------------------
December 11, 2001
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Following a bench trial, Pedro Naranjo-Hernandez, who was
previously convicted of an aggravated felony, was convicted of
illegally reentering the United States. Naranjo-Hernandez
appeals the district court’s denial of his pretrial motion to
suppress evidence. Naranjo-Hernandez has not shown that the
district court erred in denying his motion to suppress. See
United States v. Pineda-Chinchilla,
712 F.2d 942, 943 (5th Cir.
1983); United States v. Roque-Villanueva,
175 F.3d 345 (5th Cir.
1999). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.