Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pablo Carpio-Reyes v. United States, 92-1831 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 92-1831 Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 08, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 985 F.2d 552, NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.Pablo CARPIO-REYES, Petitioner, v.UNITED STATES, Respondent., United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit., Before Breyer, Chief Judge, Torruella and Cyr, Circuit Judges.

985 F.2d 552

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
Pablo CARPIO-REYES, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES, Respondent.

No. 92-1831.

United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.

December 8, 1992

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Pablo Carpio-Reyes on brief pro se.

Daniel F. Lopez-Romo, United States Attorney, Edwin O. Vazquez, Assistant United States Attorney, and Jose A. Quiles-Espinosa on Motion for Summary Disposition and Memorandum of Law in Support.

D.Puerto Rico.

AFFIRMED.

Before Breyer, Chief Judge, Torruella and Cyr, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

1

In view of the Supreme Court's recent decision in United States v. Wilson, 112 S. Ct. 1351 (1992), which concluded that it is the Attorney General-and not the court-who decides whether time spent in detention will be credited towards a sentence, the district court properly denied appellant's motion for credit for time spent on bond.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer