The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (in case citations, 1st Cir.) is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:
More30 F.3d 126, NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.Safu BOATENG, Plaintiff, Appellant, v.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, Appellee., No. 94-1092, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit., Per Curiam.
979 F.2d 1539, Harrisonv.Bankers First Federal***, NO. 92-8173, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit., Nov 27, 1992, 1, Appeal From: S.D.Ga., 2, AFFIRMED., *, Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3, **, Local Rule 36 case
978 F.2d 705, First Investors Corp.v.James, NO. 92-7775, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit., Sept 02, 1992, 1, Appeal From: S.D.N.Y., 2, AFFIRMED.
981 F.2d 1248, Thornton (Timothy A.)v.First National Bank of Mifflintown, McLaughlin (James R.), Rhoads Sinon, Thornton (Betty J.), O'Brien (Robert L.), NO. 92-7225, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit., Nov 30, 1992, Appeal From: M.D.Pa. Caldwell, J., 1, AFFIRMED.
989 F.2d 488, St. Paul's African Union First Colored Methodist ProtestantChurch of Washington D.C.v.Comegys (Morris A.), Gardner (Sara B.), Cassidy (Anna B.), Clayton (Lydia), Gibbs (Jane J.), Jackson (JohnJ., Oct 09, 1992, Appeal From: D.Del.Robinson, J., 1, AFFIRMED.
All three averred that female officers perform substantially the same duties as male officers and that they had no authority to change the job duties of correctional officers to limit the possibility that female officers would see inmates on the toilet or in the shower. 3823 (U.S. 1991);
977 F.2d 567, Computer Associates International, Inc.v.First Fidelity Bancorporation, Fidelity Bank, N.A., Merchants Bank (North), First FidelityBank, N.A. North NewJersey, First Fidelity Bank, N.A. South Jersey, NO. 92-5427, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.Politan, J., 1, AFFIRMED.
), Public Service Elec.Public Serv. Gas Co. v. FSB/ Kelson, Foster, Schermerhorn, Barnes, Inc., Kelso, NO. 92-5121, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit., Sept 29, 1992, Appeal From: D.N.J.
971 F.2d 748, First Capitalv.Enco Systems*, NO. 92-4313, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit., Aug 04, 1992, 1, Appeal From: W.D.La., 2, AFFIRMED., *, Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2
, 5, The second trust, Trust B, is a Marital Deduction Trust or QTIP Trust to be funded with that portion of the residue of Testator's estate for which a timely QTIP election is made.
983 F.2d 1066, NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.Donald DOYLE; William Peterson;
986 F.2d 499, First Commercial Finv.CFTC, NOS. 92-4104, 92-4106, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit., Dec 03, 1992, 1, Appeal From: C.T.F.C., 2, AFFIRMED.
, United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Bankruptcy Rule 9014 provides that Bankr.R., 13, In order for this court to conduct a meaningful review of the bankruptcy court's decision, the bankruptcy court must tell us what facts it found and what law it is applying in reaching its result.
United States v. Hoyland, 914 F.2d 1125, 1129-30 (9th Cir.1990). Brown, 954 F.2d at 1568 (The government need only prove that the defendant was aware of the bank reporting requirement for currency transactions in excess of $10, 000 and sought to evade those requirements through money structuring.
980 F.2d 721, NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.In RE: WILLIS FURNITURE COMPANY, INC., Appellant. We will not consider debtor's rather undeveloped argument, presented (so far as appears) for the first time on appeal.
December 11, 1992 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 92-2391 IN RE: WILLIS FURNITURE COMPANY, INC., Appellant. We will not consider debtor's rather undeveloped argument, presented (so far as appears) for the first time on appeal.
, 1, Oris J. Glass and Leourieta B. Glass appeal from the district court's1 order granting several defendants involved in Oris Glass's bankruptcy case summary judgment on the basis of res judicata, and awarding defendants sanctions under Fed. See Hendrick, 891 F.2d at 586-89.
, United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Where this prerequisite is not satisfied, a party cannot question the sufficiency of the evidence either before the district court through a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or an appeal. Myers, 696 F.2d at 559.
, 4, In his response to the show cause order, Cabral argues that we have jurisdiction over his appeal for the following reasons: (1) Cabral removed the BNE/FDIC lawsuit on the authority of 12 U.S.C. 1819(b)(2)(B), which says that the Corporation [i.e., the FDIC] may ...
December 11, 1992 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 92-1967 DANNY M. KELLY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. WILLIAM F. WELD, Defendant, Appellee. For the reasons set forth in the district court opinion, we affirm.
