Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Arthur Stanley Kerns v. Charles McWilliams the Mobile Press Register, Inc., and the United Press International, Inc., 29703 (1971)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 29703 Visitors: 51
Filed: Jan. 15, 1971
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 435 F.2d 1306 Arthur Stanley KERNS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Charles McWILLIAMS, the Mobile Press Register, Inc., and the United Press International, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 29703. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Jan. 15, 1971. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama; Daniel Holcombe Thomas, Judge. W. B. Hand, Hand, Arendall, Bedsole, Greaves & Johnston, Mobile, Ala., for appellants Mobile Press Register, Inc. and Charles M
More

435 F.2d 1306

Arthur Stanley KERNS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Charles McWILLIAMS, the Mobile Press Register, Inc., and the
United Press International, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 29703.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 15, 1971.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama; Daniel Holcombe Thomas, Judge.

W. B. Hand, Hand, Arendall, Bedsole, Greaves & Johnston, Mobile, Ala., for appellants Mobile Press Register, Inc. and Charles McWilliams.

J. Edward Thornton, Mobile, Ala., for appellant, United Press International, Inc.; Thornton & McGowin, Mobile, Ala., of counsel.

Leon G. Duke, Mobile, Ala., Georgie E. Estes, Len T. Blackwell, Gulfport, Miss., for appellees.

Before BELL, DYER and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Charles McWilliams, The Mobile Press Register, Inc. and the United Press International, Inc., defendants in this libel suit, were granted leave to take an interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 1292(b) from an order of the District Court denying their motions for summary judgment.

2

After considering the briefs and oral arguments we conclude that the order allowing the interlocutory appeal was improvidently granted. Spurlin v. General Motors Corp., 5 Cir. 1970, 426 F.2d 294.

3

Accordingly, the order heretofore allowing the interlocutory appeal is vacated and the case is remanded for trial on the issues of actual malice defamation and possible damages in accordance with the standards of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 1964, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S. Ct. 710, 11 L. Ed. 2d 686 even, though the appellees are not public officials, since they were engaged in a matter of public interest and concern. Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 1967, 388 U.S. 130, 152-155, 87 S. Ct. 1975, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1094; Time, Inc. v. Ragano, 5 Cir. 1970, 427 F.2d 219; Bon Air Hotel, Inc. v. Time, Inc., 5 Cir. 1970, 426 F.2d 858; Wasserman v. Time, Inc., 1970, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 7, 424 F.2d 920; Time, Inc. v. McLaney, 5 Cir. 1969, 406 F.2d 565, cert. denied, 395 U.S. 922, 89 S. Ct. 1776, 23 L. Ed. 2d 239.

4

Vacated and remanded.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer