Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Paul Albert Patterson v. United States, 73-2089 (1974)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 73-2089 Visitors: 44
Filed: Jan. 11, 1974
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 487 F.2d 1300 Paul Albert PATTERSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 73-2089 Summary Calendar. * United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Jan. 11, 1974. John J. C. O'Shea, Lubbock, Tex., for petitioner-appellant. Robert B. Wilson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Lubbock, Tex., W. E. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., Forth Worth, Tex., for respondent-appellee. Before THORNBERRY, GOLDBERG and RONEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 After petitioner, Paul Albert Patterson,
More

487 F.2d 1300

Paul Albert PATTERSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 73-2089 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 11, 1974.

John J. C. O'Shea, Lubbock, Tex., for petitioner-appellant.

Robert B. Wilson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Lubbock, Tex., W. E. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., Forth Worth, Tex., for respondent-appellee.

Before THORNBERRY, GOLDBERG and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

After petitioner, Paul Albert Patterson, served his time and paid his fine for his 1963 federal conviction based on an indictment charging him with depositing in the mails a letter containing obscene, lewd, lascivious and indecent photographs, he applied for a writ in the nature of coram nobis to the District Court. The District Judge denied relief.

2

We have found the recent Supreme Court cases do not mandate a different result. Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S. Ct. 2607, 37 L. Ed. 2d 419 (1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49, 93 S. Ct. 2628, 37 L. Ed. 2d 446 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U.S. 139, 93 S. Ct. 2674, 37 L. Ed. 2d 513 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U.S. 115, 93 S. Ct. 2680, 37 L. Ed. 2d 492 (1973); United States v. 12 200 Ft. Reels of Super 8mm Film, 413 U.S. 123, 93 S. Ct. 2665, 37 L. Ed. 2d 500 (1973).

3

Affirmed.

*

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer