Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GSC Construction, Inc., ASBCA No. 59046 (2016)

Court: Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Number: ASBCA No. 59046 Visitors: 30
Judges: McIlmail
Filed: Jun. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: James S. DelSordo, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59046, Appeal of GSC, Construction, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) GSC Construction, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 59046 ) Under Contract No. W9126G-11-D-0061 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: James S. DelSordo, Esq. Argus Legal, LLC Manassas, VA APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. Engineer Chief Trial Attorney Ronald J. Goodeyon, Esq. Jason R. Chester, Esq. Keith J. Klein, Esq. Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. Army Engineer District, Tulsa OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MCILMAIL ON THE GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE The government requests that the appeal be dismissed because appellant failed to respond to discovery requests by 29 April 2016, as the Board had ordered. The Board subsequently ordered appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for failure to comply with that order. Appellant responded that it complied with the Board's order with respect to the production of the documents, but through oversight neglected timely to produce the written responses to the government's requests. Appellant says that it has, since, provided those written responses. The government replies that it now has the documents and the written responses (both received late, it says), but continues to request dismissal, and, in the alternative, requests the exclusion of evidence. The government also complains about the form in which appellant produced the documents. The government's request for dismissal of the appeal is denied. Although the Board looks unfavorably upon appellant's conduct, dismissal-a sanction universally recognized as a last resort*-is too harsh a remedy, particularly because the hearing of this appeal is more than six months off (23 January 2017). Dated: 14 June 2016 ~~ T~CILMAL Administrative Judge Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals I concur I concur #~~ "MARK N. STEMPLN RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Vice Chairman Armed Services Board Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals of Contract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59046, Appeal of GSC Construction, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated: JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals * The Public Warehousing Co., ASBCA No. 56022, 13 BCA ~ 35,201at172,706. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer