ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company ) ASBCA No. 61480 ) Under Contract No. F33657-03-C-2014 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Stephen J. McBrady, Esq. Nicole J. Owren-Wiest, Esq. Skye Mathieson, Esq. Crowell & Moring LLP Washington, DC APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq. Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney Kyle E. Gilbertson, Esq. Justin D. Haselden, Esq. Trial Attorneys OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE THRASHER The contracting officer's final decision from which this appeal was taken has been rescinded. The government has moved to dismiss the appeal as moot and appellant does I not object. When a contracting officer unequivocally rescinds a government claim, the government's action moots the appeal, leaving the Board without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal further. Combat Support Associates, ASBCA Nos. 58945, 58946, 16-1 BCA ,i 36,288 at 176,973. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as moot. Dated: June 25, 2018 I dministrative Judge Chairman I (Signatures continued) Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals II I I, f t  I concur I concur ~KLEFORD J~/ LIS B. YOUNG I Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals of Contract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61480, Appeal of Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated: 1. I JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals 2