Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

91-3437 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Number: 91-3437 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 18, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 986 F.2d 206 81 Ed. Law Rep. 423 PARENTS FOR QUALITY EDUCATION WITH INTEGRATION, INC., Scepter Brownlee, by his mother and next friend, Ora Brownlee, Torrey Cook, by his parents and next friends, Regina Cook and Richard Cook, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE OF INDIANA, Evan Bayh, Governor of the State of Indiana, Linley E. Pearson, Attorney General of the State of Indiana, Dr. H. Dean Evans, State Superintendent of Public Instruction and Chairman of the State Board of Education, Dr. David
More

986 F.2d 206

81 Ed. Law Rep. 423

PARENTS FOR QUALITY EDUCATION WITH INTEGRATION, INC.,
Scepter Brownlee, by his mother and next friend, Ora
Brownlee, Torrey Cook, by his parents and next friends,
Regina Cook and Richard Cook, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
STATE OF INDIANA, Evan Bayh, Governor of the State of
Indiana, Linley E. Pearson, Attorney General of the State of
Indiana, Dr. H. Dean Evans, State Superintendent of Public
Instruction and Chairman of the State Board of Education,
Dr. David O. Dickson, Ted L. Marston, Paul L. McFann, David
H. Swanson, Connie Blackketter, Margaret Ann Kelley, Dr.
Norma J. Cook, Katherine L. Startin, J. Patrick O'Rear,
Grant W. Hawkins, Members of the Indiana State Board of
Education, and Indiana Department of Education, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 91-3437.

United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.

Feb. 18, 1993.

1

Before CUMMINGS and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges, and DILLIN, District Judge.*

ORDER ON REHEARING

2

The State of Indiana is not, under the Eleventh Amendment, a proper defendant and is hereby dismissed.

3

The opinion of the court issued October 23, 1992, 977 F.2d 1207, is hereby modified as provided in this order.

4

On page 3 of the opinion, 14 lines from the top, delete the parenthetical reading:

5

(the State of Indiana and state officials)

6

On further consideration of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc, no judge in active service has requested a vote thereon and all of the judges on the original panel have voted to deny rehearing. Accordingly,

7

IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid petition for rehearing be, and the same is hereby, DENIED.

*

Hon. S. Hugh Dillin, of the Southern District of Indiana, is sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer