Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sandra Kemper v. St. Louis County, 09-2152 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 09-2152 Visitors: 24
Filed: Feb. 17, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-2152 _ Sandra Kemper, Now * known as Sandra Bryant, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. St. Louis County, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: February 11, 2010 Filed: February 17, 2010 _ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Sandra Kemper appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing her federal civil rights and state-law tort c
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                           FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 09-2152
                                    ___________

Sandra Kemper, Now                       *
known as Sandra Bryant,                  *
                                         *
             Appellant,                  *
                                         * Appeal from the United States
      v.                                 * District Court for the Eastern
                                         * District of Missouri.
St. Louis County,                        *
                                         * [UNPUBLISHED]
             Appellee.                   *
                                    ___________

                              Submitted: February 11, 2010
                                 Filed: February 17, 2010
                                  ___________

Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
                         ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Sandra Kemper appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing her federal civil
rights and state-law tort claims against St. Louis County. After careful de novo
review, see O’Neil v. Simplicity, Inc., 
574 F.3d 501
, 503 (8th Cir. 2009) (dismissal),
Cousineau v. Norstan, Inc., 
322 F.3d 493
, 499 (8th Cir. 2003) (questions of state law),
we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________


      1
        The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer