United States Court of Appeals
                         FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                  ___________

                                  No. 09-2255
                                  ___________

In re: Cheryl Anne Reagan,               *
                                         *
               Debtor,                   *
                                         *
-----------------------------------      *
                                         *
Cheryl Anne Reagan,                      *
                                         *
               Appellant,                *
                                         * Appeal from the United States
        v.                               * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
                                         * for the Eighth Circuit.
Frederick S. Wetzel, III, Trustee;       *
1919 M Street Associates;                * [UNPUBLISHED]
G. Latt Bachelor, Personal               *
Representative of the Estate of          *
Ronald E. Reagan,                        *
                                         *
               Appellees.                *
                                    ___________

                             Submitted: March 15, 2010
                                Filed: March 18, 2010
                                 ___________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
                        ___________

PER CURIAM.
       Cheryl Anne Reagan appeals from the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate
Panel (BAP) affirming the order of the bankruptcy court,1 which denied her motion
to dismiss the case or remove the trustee, and approved the conversion of her case
from a case under Chapter 11 to a case under Chapter 7. We agree with the BAP that
the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying Reagan’s motions to
dismiss the case or to remove the trustee, or in finding that her case should be
converted to a Chapter 7 proceeding. See In re M & S. Grading, Inc., 

,
867 (8th Cir. 2008) (denial of motion to remove trustee is reviewed for abuse of
discretion); In re Hedquist, 

, 804 (8th Cir. 2006) (bankruptcy court’s
decision whether to dismiss Chapter 11 case is reviewed for abuse of discretion); In
re Lumber Exch. Bldg. Ltd. P’ship, 

, 648 (8th Cir. 1992) (bankruptcy
court has broad discretion in deciding whether to dismiss or convert Chapter 11 case).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

       As to Reagan’s challenge to the bankruptcy court’s order approving the terms
of the sale of Federal News Service, Inc. (FNS), which is part of the bankruptcy estate,
we conclude that this issue is moot. The bankruptcy court has since rescinded the sale
of FNS and instructed the trustee to obtain new bids for the company. Thus, at this
time there is no order of sale, and Reagan’s objections to the sale price are no longer
relevant. See PFS Dist. Co. v. Raduechel, 

, 599-600 (8th Cir. 2009)
(case is moot when it no longer presents actual, ongoing case or controversy).

      Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
                      ______________________________




      1
      The Honorable Ben T. Barry, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern
and Western Districts of Arkansas.

                                          -2-